Josy Daems vs Sapfo Sakellaridi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Jun at 12:24 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Daems vs S. Sakellaridi

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GRE
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Daems 1 - 0 Sakellaridi
They have played 1 sets in total, with Josy Daems winning 1 and Sapfo Sakellaridi winning 0. The last match between Josy Daems and Sapfo Sakellaridi was at the W50 Troisdorf, 04-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Josy Daems getting the victory 1-0 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daems | 1 |
| Sakellaridi | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W50 Troisdorf(06-04-25)
J. Daems vs S. Sakellaridi H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.77% (58-46) | Career Total W/L | 57.51% (421-311) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 5 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Daems vs S. Sakellaridi Match Preview:
- How do both players perform on the second serve? Sakellaridi has a slight edge with 39.86% points won, compared to Daems' 39.15%.
- In terms of return game stats, Daems leads by winning 51.38% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Sakellaridi wins 48.51%.
- For first serve returns, Daems again surpasses Sakellaridi with a higher win percentage of 34.55% versus 27.63%.
- Daems also performs better under pressure, having saved 50.89% of breakpoints compared to Sakellaridi's 47.01%.
- In the last year, Daems has a slight advantage in winning proportions with 57.69% (W/L 30/22) over Sakellaridi’s 56.64% (W/L 64/49).
- Sakellaridi excels on Clay with a 61% win rate, while Daems performs better on Hard courts with a 59% win rate. Is surface a critical component? Possibly.
- Sakellaridi typically plays at Challengers/ITF levels, winning 53.85% of the time, whereas Daems often competes in Futures/ITF, winning 64.29%.
- Sakellaridi has faced slightly weaker opponents, with an average rank of 466.91 against Daems’ 447.58.
- Daems is more successful in deciding sets, winning 69% compared to Sakellaridi’s 46%.
- In converting breakpoints, Daems has the edge with 40.29% against Sakellaridi's 37.25%.
Editorial Prediction (June 4, 2025, UTC):
Recent performance metrics suggest a competitive match between Sakellaridi and Daems. Although Sakellaridi has shown marginal strength with second serves, Daems has a superior return game, especially for first serves, which could be pivotal in building early leads during points.
When under pressure, Daems' ability to save breakpoints effectively, along with their superior conversion rate on break chances, positions them strongly in high-stakes moments. Despite Sakellaridi's slight edge on Clay surfaces, Daems' consistency in deciding sets and overall match-winning ratio indicates a tighter grip during critical match phases.
Furthermore, Daems' recent competition against higher-ranked players might have better prepared them for challenging match situations.
Considering these dynamics, Daems appears more likely to secure the victory in this upcoming tennis encounter.
Josy Daems vs Sapfo Sakellaridi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Daems vs S. Sakellaridi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 1 | Games Won | 0 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:6:21 | Average Match Time | 0:6:21 |
| 67% (4/6) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 75% (3/4) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 33% (2/6) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Daems Recent Matches Played
S. Sakellaridi Recent Matches Played

J. Daems vs S. Sakellaridi Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.77% (58/46) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.51% (421/311) |
| 52.54% (124/112) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.43% (928/688) |
| 50.78% (1109/1075) | Games Win/Loss | 53.53% (7679/6667) |
| 62.16% (23/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.45% (62/54) |
| 48.98% (24/25) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.42% (347/237) |
| 61.11% (11/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 37.50% (12/20) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 86 | Aces Total | 896 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 282 | Total Double Faults | 1519 |
| 1:40:14 | Average Match Time | 1:20:28 |
| 468.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 473.35 |
| 65% (4119/6304) | 1st Serve % | 63% (23766/37713) |
| 58% (2406/4119) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (14270/23766) |
| 46% (1016/2185) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (6358/13958) |
| 47% (383/817) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2410/4814) |
| 46% (2899/6288) | Return Points Win % | 47% (17281/36732) |
| 50.00% (20/20) | Challenger W/L | 51.67% (186/174) |
| 59.38% (38/26) | Futures W/L | 63.17% (235/137) |
| 55% (57/103) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (419/717) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 70% (14/20) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (54/93) |
| 69% (20/29) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (77/161) |
| 96% (50/48) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (432/384) |
| 4% (50/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (432/46) |
| 19% (54/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (300/37) |